tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28009703.post7665460648160993393..comments2024-03-18T05:45:09.883-04:00Comments on Software Development, Programming, Technology : News and Extra Insight: Dartium for Windows Download : Chrome browser with native Dart-Language VM for Windows ReleasedMike Eberharthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16410014970702142362noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28009703.post-21230061718151238062012-07-07T18:07:56.064-04:002012-07-07T18:07:56.064-04:00Anonymous,
Clearly you either see no benefit from ...Anonymous,<br />Clearly you either see no benefit from the code-maintainability that OOP can bring to the table (through encapsulation, polymorphism, and inheritance) or you simply don't care to see those OOP features as a positive. It is not like procedures and functions are *gone* in OOP, they are just methods on a class. So what? <br /><br />I have programmed since assembler, and I haveMike Eberharthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16410014970702142362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28009703.post-18417930593986101402012-07-07T15:31:36.004-04:002012-07-07T15:31:36.004-04:00Sorry , but I have to laugh my ass off when I hear...Sorry , but I have to laugh my ass off when I hear someone say they need OOP to program. Biggest Myth in programming. I've been programming since the late 80's, with procedures, functions, classes, and methods. I'll take procedures and functions for the win. You can look at function calls and almost immediately tell what it does, not so with many classes. To me classes get in the way,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28009703.post-28381670025564114492012-05-24T02:15:34.853-04:002012-05-24T02:15:34.853-04:00it really helped me.thanxit really helped me.thanxAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com